White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan, who is taking
on new authority over strikes, once backed "enhanced-interrogation
techniques."
5/23/12
As I figure it, there are two death panels in the United States. One is
within the C.I.A., where high-ranking intelligence professionals decide, via
some opaque protocol, who they want to kill with armed drones. I used to assume
that they put all the names on a list. But it was subsequently reported that sometimes the C.I.A. kills people whose identities it doesn't even
know. Then there's the other death panel. It determines whose death will
be sought by drones that the Department of Defense controls. These human targets
used to be determined in a meeting that involved the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, various unnamed national security officials, and Obama
Administration counterterrorism adviser John Brennan. They'd talk things over
and debate names. Now the protocol is changing for both
programs. "White House counterterror chief John Brennan has seized the
lead in choosing which terrorists will be targeted for drone attacks or raids,
establishing a new procedure for both military and CIA targets," Kimberly Dozier
of the Associated Press reports. "The effort concentrates power over the use of lethal
U.S. force outside war zones within one small team at the White House ... Under
the new plan, Brennan's staff compiles the potential target list and runs the
names past agencies such as the State Department at a weekly White House
meeting." So who is the man with this extraordinarily powerful influence
over who lives and dies in the due-process-free world of international
assassinations? An experienced intelligence officer with 25 years experience,
fluent Arabic skills ... and a more controversial recent history in
government. Glenn Greenwald summarizes:
In November, 2008, media reports strongly suggested that President
Obama intended to name John Brennan as CIA Director. But controversy over Brennan's recent history -- he was a Bush-era
CIA official who expressly advocated "enhanced interrogation techniques" and
rendition -- forced him to "withdraw" from consideration, as he publicly
issued a letter citing "strong criticism in some quarters" of his CIA
advocacy.
So to sum up, Barack Obama insists while campaigning
that "enhanced-interrogation techniques" are a euphemism for illegal, immoral
torture that makes us less rather than more safe from terrorism, and insists
that the Bush Administration was imprudent for using those tactics.
After
being elected, Obama forbids those tactics from being used.
And he names
as a top counterterrorism adviser someone who advocated the tactics he regards
as imprudent and immoral -- ultimately entrusting him with more power than
anyone else to decide whether various figures should be assassinated by our
classified flying robot army.
What an unlikely series of
actions.
|