|August 24, 2011
so DC gets weirder by the day. I grew up in Los Angeles earthquakes come with
the territory. Its Washington, I thought all we had to deal with was steamy
humidity in the summer and snowmageddon in the winter. After all, this place was
built on a swamp, not the San Andreas Fault. So Tuesdays quake was quite
something (you can watch me here getting up close and personal
with the earthquake).
nothing like the earthquakes shaking the Arab world. Developments in Egypt,
Syria, Gaza, and at the moment especially Libya, all shaking the assumptions and
at least some of the strategic goals of Washington, NATO, and the oil
Egypt, the post-Mubarak scene is one of continuing struggle to achieve the still
unmet goals of the Tahrir Square protesters. The emergence of an Egyptian
government concerned at least a little bit with maintaining public support,
means among other things that Israel cannot count on a compliant Egyptian
authority prepared to provide unequivocal political cover for Israel's human
rights violations or worse. The huge angry demonstrations outside the Israeli
embassy in Cairo, protesting the Israeli military's killing of three Egyptian
soldiers, was the most recent example. At this moment, it may well be that
Israeli fear of Egyptian consequences is the one thing preventing a full-scale
Israeli war on Gaza.
related issue in Egypt is the trial of ousted President Hosni Mubarak. There's
been a lot of criticism about the trial not meeting international human rights
standards and while I agree with those criticisms, I actually disagree with
the critics. In my article in al Jazeera I wrote about the real
significance of the trial being less about establishing a human rights-based
judiciary, and more about showing Egyptians and the world that there's no going
then there's Libya. I'm afraid much of the celebrating is way too premature.
Libyans haven't reclaimed their country yet, either from the Qaddafi
dictatorship or from the recent dependence on NATO and U.S. military support. As
I write, the fighting in Tripoli continues, and it's looking likely to get worse
long before it gets better. My article "Too Soon to Declare Victory" is reprinted below I wrote about the uncertain consequences
of even a real defeat of the Qaddafi regime. I talked with Amy Goodman on
Democracy Now! about the role of the U.S., NATO, and
the oil companies in Libya as the fighting continues. And later that same day I
talked with Paul Jay on The Real News about the international law
ramifications of the Libya war, and whether the U.S./NATO air strikes and other
military action actually violate the UN Security Council resolution despite its
virtually unlimited language.
the meantime of course the economic crisis continues to deepen and the wars in
Iraq and especially Afghanistan continue to worsen. One effort to challenge both
of those realities is the new Rebuilding the Dream movement, that's trying to
pull together a whole range of activists linking issues from jobs to health care
to education to the costs of war. Thousands of people came together in house
meetings to discuss and vote on the top ten priorities and not surprisingly
ending the wars and bringing the troops and war dollars home was among them. We
at IPS are collaborating with a broad coalition of citizen groups on many of the
planks of the Contract for the American Dream, and I drafted the fact sheet for that anti-war plank so for
those of you working to link the costs of war with ending the economic crisis,
this is for you.
just a couple of days, the monument to Dr. Martin Luther King on the Washington
Mall will open to the public. With our world challenged daily by environmental
destruction (that earthquake didn't come out of nowhere!), by rising poverty and
profound racism and inequality, and by expanding wars across the globe, it
becomes clearer than ever that this new movement, indeed all our movements, will
be judged by how broadly we mobilize, and how powerfully we challenge what Dr
King so memorably identified as the "giant triplet of racism, extreme
materialism, and militarism."
have a lot of work to do.
a great rest of the summer, and as always, thanks for your support.
Phyllis Bennis, 22 August 2011.
Qaddafi's whereabouts are still unknown, and the defeat of his regime may be
near at hand. But the consequences of that defeat remain uncertain.
origins of the Libyan transition emerged very much in the context of the Arab
Spring a popular uprising against a brutal dictatorship. But unlike others in
the neighborhood Egypt and Tunisia especially, but also Bahrain, even Syria
Libyans quickly took up arms on a large scale to challenge the regime's assault.
That initial decision soon led to calls for a Western no-fly zone, and quickly
to the welcoming of direct US/NATO/Qatari military intervention based on the UN
resolution's "all necessary measures" language.
the resolution's focus on protecting civilians, it was U.S., European and NATO
officials who made the actual decisions about the use of force and quickly the
NATO planes began what one al Jazeera reporter described as "openly functioning
as the air force of the opposition army." Particularly in these last few days of
fast-moving gains by the opposition, air power played a disproportionately
important role. That means that the ability of opposition forces to move into
Tripoli, take control of at least parts of the capital so quickly, and
potentially accede to power, was dependent on NATO.
circumstances are different from other recent overthrows of Arab tyrants. The
people visible overnight, celebrating in Tripoli's Green Square (renamed Martyrs
Square by the opposition) were overwhelmingly armed rebels, largely coming into
Tripoli from the mountains to the south. Unlike the celebrations in Tahrir
Square in Egypt and other similar venues, there were virtually no women except
for reporters. Many local residents had already fled the city, most others
remained indoors, as violence continued to flare across Tripoli. Few were
visible to greet the rebel forces as they entered the city. This may have been
the continuing uncertainty of conditions in the city, but it also may reflect
ambivalence or perhaps even stronger unease about the opposition forces among
Tripoli's population, which accounts for about a third of Libya's people.
Benghazi, the rebel capital in eastern Libya, Sunday's celebrations went on all
night. By mid-day Monday the head of Libya's Transitional National Council, the
rebel leadership already recognized by the U.S. and numerous other countries as
the rightful government of Libya, spoke at a press conference, congratulating
the people of Tripoli and in effect claiming the expanding control by
anti-Qaddafi forces as the achievement of the TNC.
the legitimacy of the TNC remains contested. It is a widely diverse,
self-selected group already facing significant and sometimes lethal division
within its ranks. It remains unclear how much popular support there was for the
TNC's decision to ask for foreign military intervention. Even now, as Patrick
Cockburn wrote in The Independent, the "Transitional National
Council (TNC) in Benghazi is now recognized by more than 30 foreign governments,
including the U.S. and Britain, as the government of Libya. But it is by no
means clear that it is recognized as such by the rebel militiamen who are in the
process of seizing the capital. The rebel fighters in Misrata, who fought so
long to defend their city, say privately that they have no intention of obeying
orders from the TNC." Certainly it is military and security exigencies that have
resulted in Tripoli not being represented in the Council, but it also remains
uncertain whether the TNC's leadership is recognized in the capital or not. It
remains too soon to say whether the TNC will show itself willing to broaden out
to embrace Libyans so far excluded.
success of Libya's uprising will have a great deal to do with the willingness of
its leadership to break its dependency on the U.S. and NATO. In what might or
might not be a positive sign in that direction, TNC officials have said they
intend to call for United Nations assistance in holding new elections
within eight months of taking power. But more immediately, if the U.S. and
European countries turn over the billions in frozen Libyan assets directly to
the TNC, the question of the breadth of its representation and its legitimacy
become even more crucial. Will the TNC, eager to claim the billions of oil money
being held by European and U.S. banks, demand that NATO and the U.S. pull back
and allow Libya to sort out its own problems and develop its own trajectory for
an independent future? That may be difficult with President Obama announcing that the U.S. "will join
with allies and partners to continue the work of safeguarding the people of
Libya." During a Monday press conference the president of the TNC, Mustafa Abdul
Jalil, thanked the international community as a whole but singled out those
countries that had been especially supportive of the TNC; the implication was
unmistakable that those countries, presumably the U.S., other NATO members and
Qatar (whose special forces had trained the TNC's "Tripoli Brigade") could expect closer ties
and privileged access to Libyan resources in the future.
more than anything else, will determine whether a "new Libya" has a chance of
becoming a truly new, unified and sovereign Libya, or whether it just moves from
control by a small family-based autocracy to control by outside Western forces
more interested in maintaining privileged access to Libya's oil and strategic
location than in the human and national rights of Libya's people.
Libyan uprising began as part of the Arab Spring, with an effort to depose one
more Arab dictator. Current developments are moving towards that goal. But the
complications of the Libyan Summer, and the consequences of the militarization
of its struggle, leave unanswered the question of whether events so far are
ultimately a victory for the Libyan people, or for NATO. Given recent models of
U.S. and NATO involvement in overthrowing dictatorships, we don't have a lot of
examples of how it can be both.