The UUP Delegate
Assembly met in Rochester October 2-3. Delegates passed the following
resolution, brought to the body by three committees: Labor and Higher
Education, Solidarity, and Women's Rights and Concerns.
Whereas the mission, strategy,
and tasks of counterinsurgency are not those of counterterrorism, and
Whereas the
military pursuit of counterinsurgency can create many more terrorists than it
kills, and
Whereas
counterinsurgency strategy involves nation-building, which would draw the U.S.
into a long term engagement with the corrupt and illegitimate government of
Hamid Karzai, with no foreseeable exit from a country well know as the
"graveyard of empires," and
Whereas
U.S. standing in the world will benefit from the exercise of more wisdom rather
than more raw power,
Whereas
military spending creates many fewer jobs than the same amount spent on
infrastructure and other domestic needs (Robert Pollin and Heidi
Garrett-Peltier, “The Wages of Peace,” The Nation , March 31, 2008),
and
Whereas the
$65 billion to be spent in Afghanistan this year, and the hundreds of billions
of dollars required in coming years for counterinsurgency there, are desperately
needed for urgent domestic social purposes, not least health care for all,
housing relief in the foreclosure crisis, full veterans benefits, and the
creation of millions of jobs, therefore be it
Resolved that UUP opposes any
further escalation of US military forces in Afghanistan, and be it
further
Resolved that UUP calls for the immediate start to the drawing down
of all U.S. military forces and contractors from Afghanistan, and be it
further
Resolved that UUP calls for defeat of terrorist conspiracies and
networks through appropriate lawful police, intelligence, and financial means,
and be it further
Resolved that UUP calls for
emphasis on diplomatic measures to enlist the broadest coalition of nations and
organizations in the isolation, arrest, and bringing to justice of those who
engage in terrorist action against the United States, and be it
further
Resolved that UUP calls for the redirection of the military budget
for Afghanistan to urgently needed U.S. social programs, and be it
further
Resolved that UUP will undertake an educational campaign on these
issues among its membership and seek to involve the members in the political
tasks necessary to implement this resolution in public policy, and be it
further
Resolved that UUP will communicate this resolution to its elected
representatives and our affiliates with a request that they act accordingly.
##
There was surprisingly little objection to this language. After
debate in which no one spoke directly against the substance (a couple of people
raised proxy procedural objections that got nowhere) it passed by voice vote by
somewhere around 85-15 or even 90-10. There were about 300 delegates at the
meeting. On another resolution that touched on gun rights, vocal opposition did
emerge, but not on this resolution (and without winning the vote). In UUP, it is
now a settled question that anti-war resolutions are part of union business. The
principal arguments presented in the debate that carried the vote were the
urgency of weighing in with a position at this moment, when the Obama
administration is locked in debate about the war; the unacceptable cost, in
money and lives; the impossible military task of nation building; the desperate
need for the oney to be used for education and other domestic
needs.
One supporter of the Afghanistan
resolution questioned how we could pass it given the consequences for women if
the Taliban gained power in Afghanistan. Here it was significant that the
resolution had the support of the Women's Rights and Concerns Committee (which
had voted 15-3 with 5 abstentions to endorse it). The committee co-chairs spoke
to the question, making the following points: no war is good for women,
especially counter-insurgency warfare; women suffer disproportionately in war
from dislocation, rape, and the consequences of widowhood. We should not believe
that the war in Afghanistan is being fought by the US on behalf of women. Under
the Karzai government, laws hostile to women have been passed. The status of
women in Iraq has deteriorated dramatically since the US invasion and during the
occupation.
|